{"success":true,"data":{"id":"11dc17cf-9340-46dc-9bd3-4fd786d6f2e7","slug":"dan-walker-law-office-naperville-il","name":"Dan Walker Law Office","firstName":null,"lastName":null,"firmName":"Dan Walker Law Office","email":null,"phone":"+1630-920-8800","website":"https://www.danlawpc.com/","headshotUrl":null,"photoUrl":null,"logoUrl":null,"address":"211 W Chicago Ave # 109","address2":null,"city":"Hinsdale","county":null,"state":"IL","zipCode":"60521","latitude":41.8038917,"longitude":-87.9329441,"serviceCounties":[],"serviceCities":[],"specialties":[],"barNumber":null,"barState":"CO","licenseDate":null,"verified":false,"verifiedAt":null,"verifiedBy":null,"practiceAreas":[],"yearsExperience":0,"casesWon":0,"totalSettlements":null,"bio":null,"tagline":null,"consultationFee":null,"education":[],"awards":[],"caseResults":[],"faqs":[],"googleDescription":"211 W Chicago Ave # 109, Hinsdale, IL 60521","googleCategory":"Family law attorney","googleCategoryIds":["law_firm","lawyer","personal_injury_lawyer"],"googlePlaceId":"ChIJ5SBZw0pJDogRrSicY-p2zDU","googleCid":"3876604128324757677","googleMapsUrl":null,"isClaimed":true,"totalPhotos":2,"workHours":{"timetable":{"friday":[{"open":{"hour":8,"minute":30},"close":{"hour":17,"minute":0}}],"monday":[{"open":{"hour":8,"minute":30},"close":{"hour":17,"minute":0}}],"sunday":null,"tuesday":[{"open":{"hour":8,"minute":30},"close":{"hour":17,"minute":0}}],"saturday":null,"thursday":[{"open":{"hour":8,"minute":30},"close":{"hour":17,"minute":0}}],"wednesday":[{"open":{"hour":8,"minute":30},"close":{"hour":17,"minute":0}}]},"current_status":"close"},"businessAttributes":null,"peopleAlsoSearch":null,"websiteScreenshotUrl":null,"subscriptionTier":"free","subscriptionStatus":"active","subscriptionStartDate":null,"subscriptionEndDate":null,"monthlyLeadCap":5,"leadsReceivedThisMonth":0,"currentMonthLeads":0,"monthlySpendCap":null,"spentThisMonth":"0","capResetDate":null,"trialEndsAt":null,"preferredCrashTypes":[],"preferredSeverities":[],"minLeadScore":0,"maxLeadRadius":50,"acceptsAfterHours":false,"preferredContactMethod":"EMAIL","notificationEmail":null,"notificationPhone":null,"emailNotifications":true,"smsNotifications":false,"rating":"2.8","averageRating":2.8,"reviewsCount":13,"reviewCount":13,"avgResponseTime":null,"averageResponseTime":null,"reviewsRefreshedAt":null,"profileViews":81,"leadsReceived":0,"totalLeadsReceived":0,"leadsContacted":0,"totalLeadsContacted":0,"leadsConverted":0,"totalLeadsSigned":0,"conversionRate":0,"totalRevenue":"0","rankingScore":0,"profileCompleteness":0,"status":"PENDING","isActive":true,"isPaused":false,"pausedAt":null,"pausedUntil":null,"pauseReason":null,"isVerified":false,"isFeatured":false,"createdAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.522Z","updatedAt":"2026-11-02T00:09:30.579Z","lastLoginAt":null,"lastActiveAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.522Z","userId":null,"reviews":[{"id":"28d890db-46c6-40ac-85fc-09a5bf1e8580","rating":1,"title":null,"content":"Walker lied to me and still wanted money. Don't believe the nice old man routine. Watch your back.","reviewerName":"R Mg","isVerified":false,"caseType":null,"caseYear":null,"caseOutcome":null,"status":"APPROVED","isPublished":true,"helpfulCount":0,"unhelpfulCount":0,"source":"GOOGLE","externalId":"Ci9DQUlRQUNvZENodHljRjlvT21SaGFDMXBhWGN0UjFoS2JHMVZhazFzUVdWYWNsRRAB","reviewUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sCi9DQUlRQUNvZENodHljRjlvT21SaGFDMXBhWGN0UjFoS2JHMVZhazFzUVdWYWNsRRAB!2m1!1s0x0:0x35cc76ea639c28ad!3m1!1s2@1:CAIQACodChtycF9oOmRhaC1paXctR1hKbG1Vak1sQWVaclE%7C%7C?hl=en-US","profileUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/107829314660904236120/reviews?hl=en-US","ownerAnswer":null,"ownerTimestamp":null,"reviewTimestamp":"2026-02-01T18:27:18.000Z","timeAgo":"a month ago","isLocalGuide":false,"createdAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","lawyerId":"11dc17cf-9340-46dc-9bd3-4fd786d6f2e7","response":null},{"id":"0c14e73e-87d9-4457-bb76-3fb146107083","rating":5,"title":null,"content":"Excellent service . Great guy! Fast and very happy with service","reviewerName":"Sean Heffner (Chicago Wrap)","isVerified":false,"caseType":null,"caseYear":null,"caseOutcome":null,"status":"APPROVED","isPublished":true,"helpfulCount":0,"unhelpfulCount":0,"source":"GOOGLE","externalId":"Ci9DQUlRQUNvZENodHljRjlvT2taSlZscDBiMWRVTlhrMk1HTjFNWE4wTkV4Uk5HYxAB","reviewUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sCi9DQUlRQUNvZENodHljRjlvT2taSlZscDBiMWRVTlhrMk1HTjFNWE4wTkV4Uk5HYxAB!2m1!1s0x0:0x35cc76ea639c28ad!3m1!1s2@1:CAIQACodChtycF9oOkZJVlp0b1dUNXk2MGN1MXN0NExRNGc%7C%7C?hl=en-US","profileUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/117199002819845699595/reviews?hl=en-US","ownerAnswer":null,"ownerTimestamp":null,"reviewTimestamp":"2025-11-18T19:22:54.000Z","timeAgo":"3 months ago","isLocalGuide":true,"createdAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","lawyerId":"11dc17cf-9340-46dc-9bd3-4fd786d6f2e7","response":null},{"id":"0e7659c7-aa6b-44f4-9b66-4a2e12dff941","rating":1,"title":null,"content":"I keep running into similar problems with attorneys. Mom and I were abuse victims and she inherited some money. A sibling thought it should be his money and is an attorney. He convinced her to disinherit another sibling and me and leave everything to him until it backfired. He berated her, made threats, demanded asset access and threatened litigation. He and his wife made backroom medical decisions that almost caused Mom’s immediate death. However, neither socialized with Mom nor had any actual authority. Problems escalated in 2002 and continued until 2015.\n\nWalker’s drafts had many grammatical and factual errors, confused dates, named wrong party, the case caption was wrong, facts mixed up etc. Didn’t matter if the draft was a motion, Response or appellate brief. He sent draft after draft with the same errors. I made the corrections again and again. Missed a huge issue which could have been circumvented. The Judge ruled against me but didn’t cite why. Walker was going to appeal but did a reconsideration motion. With 30 years litigation experience certain simple things should be known, but apparently not Walker. Judge ruled against me again. Walker filed two appeal notices.\n\nWalker stated the ruling was I failed to do a specific act. Months later, I asked multiple times the nature of Judge’s ruling, but no attempted half answer until filing the first appeal brief. Walker’s new ruling version was completely different than original which was winnable. The new version was unwinnable. Before the switch on advised rulings, for months I suggested settlement, but Walker didn’t respond. When finally formed, Walker delayed sending the settlement proposal for weeks. Walker’s bill was paid in full and had a surplus retainer.\n\nDo you think Walker may have committed malpractice or fraud or padded his bill or a combination or neither or something else? Do you think he was covering up something to protect himself, not covering anything up or something completely different?\n\nNew trustee appointed. Can’t fight every issue, but Walker basically fought none. An emergency motion was filed. Walker given refuting receipts and opposition’s documents refuted the allegations, but Walker did nothing. Zero. Walker felt “uncomfortable” including any statement the attorney’s documents refuted their allegations.  10 months after appointment, assets were not transferred, real estate taxes were sold and no insurance purchased by the new trustee. Walker had no problem with the real estate taxes not being redeemed while interest, fees and penalties compounded. Walker threatened that if I didn’t help buy the insurance, he would charge me $700 for him to arrange the insurance for the new trustee.\n\nWhile Walker billed time for unwinnable appeal, time for other trial court and threating me, do you think Walker may have committed malpractice, careless negligence, fraud, intimidation, padded his bill, or some combination thereof or none of the foregoing or something else?\n\nThe Appellate Court Order ruled against appeal. No ruling on my claims and made findings in favor of the claims. Reasonable to seek payment or settlement. Walker stated new trustee to consider payment or seek a ruling. He stated settlement wasn’t likely then it was. Walker kept changing advice even when reminded of previous advice. All changes concerning the same issue and circumstances.\n\nIf interested, I have been making payments. Walker forwarded copies of the Orders with explanation, but explanations changed. I sent information but had to repeat and repeat over and over. Walker remembered what the opposition wanted.\n\nDo you think Walker has credibility, some credibility, a little credibility, zero credibility or that additional information is needed before deciding the question? Walker has been given many opportunities to fix problems and advised what might fix problems but he apparently has no interest and hasn’t responded. Zero.\n\nBy the way in case you are interested, Walker records well. I wonder if other clients experienced similar issues.","reviewerName":"GM M","isVerified":false,"caseType":null,"caseYear":null,"caseOutcome":null,"status":"APPROVED","isPublished":true,"helpfulCount":0,"unhelpfulCount":0,"source":"GOOGLE","externalId":"Ci9DQUlRQUNvZENodHljRjlvT25STFQyUmhYek5ZU1daNVlWUkNYMVphZWxKMVpVRRAB","reviewUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sCi9DQUlRQUNvZENodHljRjlvT25STFQyUmhYek5ZU1daNVlWUkNYMVphZWxKMVpVRRAB!2m1!1s0x0:0x35cc76ea639c28ad!3m1!1s2@1:CAIQACodChtycF9oOnRLT2RhXzNYSWZ5YVRCX1ZaelJ1ZUE%7C%7C?hl=en-US","profileUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/107029033957784067318/reviews?hl=en-US","ownerAnswer":null,"ownerTimestamp":null,"reviewTimestamp":"2025-10-21T01:46:57.000Z","timeAgo":"4 months ago","isLocalGuide":false,"createdAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","lawyerId":"11dc17cf-9340-46dc-9bd3-4fd786d6f2e7","response":null},{"id":"a7942969-3c28-4351-b749-2a8cc6514a91","rating":1,"title":null,"content":"Poor communication. Dan Walker said I lost my case, no, he lost my case. I had no say so, no input. He learned early on in case, Judge was probably going to rule in Defendants side. Wouldn't tell me why, just \"I get the feeling\". He said he spoke to me and my Husband many times. My Husband died before this case ended. And, I was the client. I asked his office  for updates, nothing. His \"Letter of Demand\" had multiple mistakes and. I had to ask him to make changes, just lies, stuff he made up. Such as, \"Ms. Dietz could not sleep in her bed because she could not get up the stairs to get to it\". There are no stairs to bedroom in the Ranch house, many reasons I did not sleep in my bed, but stairs were not a reason, stairs do not exist. This question was asked of me in Deposition and my husband's. Where did he get this? Then, \" Ms.Dietz needed to use a Cane for approximately 6 months.\" I used a cane for an entire 18 months, and some weeks beyond while I weaned myself off of it. Where did \"Approximately 6 months\" come from? These were false statements. Dan Walker said I lost my case because I was unable to tell Judge how I fell, I never saw a Judge, never in a Courtroom. I called his office many times to ask if I should be at Court Appearance, was told \"No, just the Attorneys\". I would then ask if I could be updated on what happened. Was told\" We will keep you updated\". Never updated other than canceled Depositions and Court Appearances. Did Dan Walker ever do the questioning? Why was I not ever allowed to give anyone my side of story? I was deposed by other side, instructed to only answer their questions, like how old are your grandkids, who was your bike riding buddy? Didn't have one. Any Social Media? Which way did your Coffee Cup lid open? I asked Dan Walker what is being done for me. He said he went to see train and he briefed me. Briefed me? On what? Questions he asked me before Deposition, like are you nearsighted or farsighted?, Why did you have Breast Surgery? Then getting angry with me when he asked how I entered train from platform, I said I turn left into vestibule, then right into car, he said \"Absolutely impossible\". What? He repeated \"Absolutely impossible\" multiple times and became angry. I saw he was drawing something, told him his sketch of train and platform were wrong, backwards. I was right. He agreed. Anyway, where is briefing? He never told me what to expect from the Depo, never told me I would never speak to anyone about my case, never told me until after he lost case that loss of wages, pain and suffering, many months of PT to learn to walk again, 4 months on a Walker, no weight bearing on right foot/leg would have no bearing on my case. Dan Walker instructed me to lie from the beginning, he said we will say you tripped on metal strip at end of ramp I fell on, then he could not prove that. I slipped on that ramp due to the ramp being wet, he said we could not use that, although it was the truth. Wish I had called Lerner and Rowe. Would never recommend this Law Firm My husband was dead. This man will not help you and he does not care","reviewerName":"Maureen Dietz","isVerified":false,"caseType":null,"caseYear":null,"caseOutcome":null,"status":"APPROVED","isPublished":true,"helpfulCount":0,"unhelpfulCount":0,"source":"GOOGLE","externalId":"ChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSUNhdkl5TjVRRRAB","reviewUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSUNhdkl5TjVRRRAB!2m1!1s0x0:0x35cc76ea639c28ad!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgICavIyN5QE%7C%7C?hl=en-US","profileUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/114453224144605796493/reviews?hl=en-US","ownerAnswer":"I did handle Ms. Dietz’ case. However contrary to her assertion I regularly communicate with her and her husband about her case.<br><br>Ms. Dietz is unhappy because she lost her case because she could not explain to the judge what caused her to fall  when boarding a Metra train.<br><br>The law requires that a Plaintiff (such as Ms. Dietz) who falls explain to the judge what caused her to fall. She was unable to do so.<br><br>I worked long and hard on Ms. Dietz’s case taking numerous  depositions (at my expense) of the conductors, train car inspectors, and others in an effort to find an explanation for her fall when she was unable to do so.<br><br>I never charged Ms. Dietz for the work I did. Her review is misdirected anger at me when I did all I could to assist her and help her with her case.<br><br>Dan Walker","ownerTimestamp":"2022-03-16T06:13:14.000Z","reviewTimestamp":"2024-11-04T01:05:09.000Z","timeAgo":"Edited a year ago","isLocalGuide":false,"createdAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","lawyerId":"11dc17cf-9340-46dc-9bd3-4fd786d6f2e7","response":null},{"id":"3e389fb2-3819-4673-8e03-6aafa47cec51","rating":5,"title":null,"content":"Mr. Walker has been handling with my child Custody case for close to or about over a year by now, it’s always a pleasure speaking with the staff at the office and him over the phone if not in person. He understood what I needed done in my case and advised the best action to take. I have to say close to all of what I wanted accomplished was done and that’s saying something for tough fought child custody case. Overall I highly recommend going with Dan Walker.","reviewerName":"Cristian Najera","isVerified":false,"caseType":null,"caseYear":null,"caseOutcome":null,"status":"APPROVED","isPublished":true,"helpfulCount":0,"unhelpfulCount":0,"source":"GOOGLE","externalId":"ChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSURUOU52aWl3RRAB","reviewUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSURUOU52aWl3RRAB!2m1!1s0x0:0x35cc76ea639c28ad!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgIDT9NviiwE%7C%7C?hl=en-US","profileUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/107391723204001012620/reviews?hl=en-US","ownerAnswer":null,"ownerTimestamp":null,"reviewTimestamp":"2024-05-23T02:22:33.000Z","timeAgo":"a year ago","isLocalGuide":false,"createdAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","lawyerId":"11dc17cf-9340-46dc-9bd3-4fd786d6f2e7","response":null},{"id":"c12fdaea-42c0-4525-91b6-a645b3abb852","rating":5,"title":null,"content":"Attorney Dan Walker is truly outstanding! When I brought my case against Chicago Public Schools to him, I was impressed by his fearless approach, especially considering their considerable resources.\n\nDan's dedication to justice was evident from the start, as he swiftly moved my case forward with efficiency and precision. Despite his busy schedule, he consistently kept me informed, demonstrating his commitment to clear communication.\n\nWhat's more, his genuine concern for my well-being, as evidenced by his post-case follow-up, speaks volumes about his character. In the courtroom, Dan was nothing short of remarkable, tirelessly advocating for my interests.\n\nThanks to his expertise and tenacity, I emerged victorious in my case. Without hesitation, I wholeheartedly endorse him to anyone seeking legal representation.\n\nDr. Phyllis Porter, CEO\nPPES Inc.","reviewerName":"Dr. Phyllis Porter","isVerified":false,"caseType":null,"caseYear":null,"caseOutcome":null,"status":"APPROVED","isPublished":true,"helpfulCount":0,"unhelpfulCount":0,"source":"GOOGLE","externalId":"ChRDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSURqX0xndRAB","reviewUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChRDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSURqX0xndRAB!2m1!1s0x0:0x35cc76ea639c28ad!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgIDj_Lgu%7C%7C?hl=en-US","profileUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/109846890570703428475/reviews?hl=en-US","ownerAnswer":null,"ownerTimestamp":null,"reviewTimestamp":"2024-04-30T18:27:22.000Z","timeAgo":"a year ago","isLocalGuide":true,"createdAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","lawyerId":"11dc17cf-9340-46dc-9bd3-4fd786d6f2e7","response":null},{"id":"d933e9c9-dc28-482d-9743-ff5744a3118b","rating":1,"title":null,"content":"He is very expensive.  He wants $5k to file a motion to  reduce child support, stating he sees the paperwork states he makes $5k a month and he wants $5k to write a motion.","reviewerName":"R Real","isVerified":false,"caseType":null,"caseYear":null,"caseOutcome":null,"status":"APPROVED","isPublished":true,"helpfulCount":0,"unhelpfulCount":0,"source":"GOOGLE","externalId":"ChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSUMxc01fZzF3RRAB","reviewUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSUMxc01fZzF3RRAB!2m1!1s0x0:0x35cc76ea639c28ad!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgIC1sM_g1wE%7C%7C?hl=en-US","profileUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/103614849669147516060/reviews?hl=en-US","ownerAnswer":null,"ownerTimestamp":null,"reviewTimestamp":"2023-12-21T04:51:30.000Z","timeAgo":"2 years ago","isLocalGuide":false,"createdAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","lawyerId":"11dc17cf-9340-46dc-9bd3-4fd786d6f2e7","response":null},{"id":"02f1726d-2efb-4391-858d-387246750a42","rating":1,"title":null,"content":"\"Free consultation\" turned into me telling him what's going on and Dan's response, \"well I charge $300 an hour if you want an answer.\"\n\n🤣 Dan  that's NOT how you get business. But you're the attorney between us, so I hope you know best.","reviewerName":"M A","isVerified":false,"caseType":null,"caseYear":null,"caseOutcome":null,"status":"APPROVED","isPublished":true,"helpfulCount":0,"unhelpfulCount":0,"source":"GOOGLE","externalId":"ChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSURPbllfRXlnRRAB","reviewUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSURPbllfRXlnRRAB!2m1!1s0x0:0x35cc76ea639c28ad!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgIDOnY_EygE%7C%7C?hl=en-US","profileUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/105411561846137108033/reviews?hl=en-US","ownerAnswer":"The reviewer does not give his name so I cannot pinpoint the client or what happened. But normally speaking during the telephone consultation I discuss the problem with the client and advise him if I know the answer, or do not. If I do not know the answer to his problem,  I tell him, and then discuss his/her options and the terms under which I will research the issue and get him an answer. If the matter involves reviewing over 10-20 pages of client documents to arrive at an answer,  I again advise the client of the time it will take me to review the documents together with my minimum charge to review the documents and give him an answer.","ownerTimestamp":"2023-03-16T06:13:14.000Z","reviewTimestamp":"2022-07-12T02:48:22.000Z","timeAgo":"3 years ago","isLocalGuide":false,"createdAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","lawyerId":"11dc17cf-9340-46dc-9bd3-4fd786d6f2e7","response":null},{"id":"2e0ba4ef-3de2-4ced-91a7-dd7ff45f8142","rating":1,"title":null,"content":"FYI: Dan Walker is a Registered Agent for Mr. Transmission located in Chicago, IL.  Mr. Walker consistently dodged the Dupage county sheriff officer and refuses to represent his client in the court of law.","reviewerName":"Ms Marsha","isVerified":false,"caseType":null,"caseYear":null,"caseOutcome":null,"status":"APPROVED","isPublished":true,"helpfulCount":0,"unhelpfulCount":0,"source":"GOOGLE","externalId":"ChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSUQwcXZpSnh3RRAB","reviewUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSUQwcXZpSnh3RRAB!2m1!1s0x0:0x35cc76ea639c28ad!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgID0qviJxwE%7C%7C?hl=en-US","profileUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/116511106347331260108/reviews?hl=en-US","ownerAnswer":"My law office is located in DuPage County. By law the Cook County Sheriff does not serve summons in DuPage County. The summons for Ms. Mallette’s Cook County case had to be sent to the DuPage County Sheriff or an Illinois licensed private detective for service.  Ms. Mallette never did so until October 25, 2019 and when she did I was served on November 14, 2019. I never dodged service of summons.  I never refused to represent the client. The amount involved was too small so the client decided not to retain me.","ownerTimestamp":"2021-03-16T06:13:14.000Z","reviewTimestamp":"2019-10-31T20:32:09.000Z","timeAgo":"6 years ago","isLocalGuide":true,"createdAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","lawyerId":"11dc17cf-9340-46dc-9bd3-4fd786d6f2e7","response":null},{"id":"f3634287-a637-45db-a972-25c342a47efe","rating":5,"title":null,"content":"Highly competent and reputable. Cesario & Walker should be the first choice in representation.","reviewerName":"Jim Broline","isVerified":false,"caseType":null,"caseYear":null,"caseOutcome":null,"status":"APPROVED","isPublished":true,"helpfulCount":0,"unhelpfulCount":0,"source":"GOOGLE","externalId":"ChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSURndlpTTm13RRAB","reviewUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/reviews/data=!4m8!14m7!1m6!2m5!1sChdDSUhNMG9nS0VJQ0FnSURndlpTTm13RRAB!2m1!1s0x0:0x35cc76ea639c28ad!3m1!1s2@1:CIHM0ogKEICAgIDgvZSNmwE%7C%7C?hl=en-US","profileUrl":"https://www.google.com/maps/contrib/116893912514835784255/reviews?hl=en-US","ownerAnswer":null,"ownerTimestamp":null,"reviewTimestamp":"2018-01-18T19:51:16.000Z","timeAgo":"8 years ago","isLocalGuide":false,"createdAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","updatedAt":"2026-05-08T23:28:26.564Z","lawyerId":"11dc17cf-9340-46dc-9bd3-4fd786d6f2e7","response":null}],"intelligence":null}}